Frequency and phase correction for multiplexed edited MRS of GABA and glutathione

TitleFrequency and phase correction for multiplexed edited MRS of GABA and glutathione
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2018
AuthorsMikkelsen M, Saleh MG, Near J, Chan KL, Gong T, Harris AD, Oeltzschner G, Puts NAJ, Cecil KM, Wilkinson ID, Edden RAE
JournalMagn Reson Med
Volume80
Issue1
Pagination21-28
Date Published2018 Jul
ISSN1522-2594
KeywordsAlgorithms, Artifacts, Brain, Computer Simulation, Databases, Factual, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Glutathione, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Likelihood Functions, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Neuroimaging, Phantoms, Imaging, Reproducibility of Results, Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Abstract

PURPOSE: Detection of endogenous metabolites using multiplexed editing substantially improves the efficiency of edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Multiplexed editing (i.e., performing more than one edited experiment in a single acquisition) requires a tailored, robust approach for correction of frequency and phase offsets. Here, a novel method for frequency and phase correction (FPC) based on spectral registration is presented and compared against previously presented approaches.

METHODS: One simulated dataset and 40 γ-aminobutyric acid-/glutathione-edited HERMES datasets acquired in vivo at three imaging centers were used to test four FPC approaches: no correction; spectral registration; spectral registration with post hoc choline-creatine alignment; and multistep FPC. The performance of each routine for the simulated dataset was assessed by comparing the estimated frequency/phase offsets against the known values, whereas the performance for the in vivo data was assessed quantitatively by calculation of an alignment quality metric based on choline subtraction artifacts.

RESULTS: The multistep FPC approach returned corrections that were closest to the true values for the simulated dataset. Alignment quality scores were on average worst for no correction, and best for multistep FPC in both the γ-aminobutyric acid- and glutathione-edited spectra in the in vivo data.

CONCLUSIONS: Multistep FPC results in improved correction of frequency/phase errors in multiplexed γ-aminobutyric acid-/glutathione-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy experiments. The optimal FPC strategy is experiment-specific, and may even be dataset-specific. Magn Reson Med 80:21-28, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

DOI10.1002/mrm.27027
Alternate JournalMagn Reson Med
PubMed ID29215137
PubMed Central IDPMC5876096
Grant ListR01 NS096207 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
R01 EB023963 / EB / NIBIB NIH HHS / United States
/ / Department of Health / United Kingdom
R01 MH106564 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
K99 MH107719 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
R00 MH107719 / MH / NIMH NIH HHS / United States
/ / Wellcome Trust / United Kingdom
P41 EB015909 / EB / NIBIB NIH HHS / United States
R01 EB016089 / EB / NIBIB NIH HHS / United States